[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archie a bird not a dino

To: "dinosaur@usc.edu" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
From: Garth Godsman <maniraptor@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 04:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.1110252155150.26824@zipcon.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.1110252155150.26824@zipcon.net>
Reply-to: Garth Godsman <maniraptor@yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

What's the image at the top of that article of? An Archie specimen?

"Scepticism is the highest of duties; blind faith the unpardonable sin." 
~Thomas Henry Huxley


________________________________
From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>
To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Cc: vrtpaleo@usc.edu
Sent: Wednesday, 26 October 2011 12:56 PM
Subject: Archie a bird not a dino

HI ALL:
FYI:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/oct/26/archaeopteryx-bird-family-tree

sincerely
-- 

Ian Paulsen
Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
Visit my BIRDBOOKER REPORT blog here:
http://birdbookerreport.blogspot.com/

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Archie a bird not a dino
  - From: Jaime Headden <qi_leong@hotmail.com>

References:
- Archie a bird not a dino
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
Next by Date: RE: Archie a bird not a dino
Previous by thread: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
Next by thread: RE: Archie a bird not a dino
Indexes: