[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archie a bird not a dino

To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:42:19 -0300
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: VRTPALEO@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <7E9C4A375E8B4F54ADB85F79D2F11DB9@TYRANT>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58L0.1110252155150.26824@zipcon.net> <8AE10C94E574445583965BB12EC51C8C@DinoHunter>
Reply-to: augustoharo@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

It seems that vertebrate paleontologists will now have to produce more
analyses (parsimony, maximum likelihood, Bayesian) with their data as
the molecular-o-logists do.

References:
- Archie a bird not a dino
  - From: Ian Paulsen <birdbooker@zipcon.net>

Prev by Date: Sauropod migration in Nature
Next by Date: Re: Sauropod migration in Nature
Previous by thread: Re: Archie a bird[, ...]
Next by thread: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
Indexes: