[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 10:18:02 +1100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <4EA83672.4060103@gmx.at>
References: <380-220111032644055459@M2W115.mail2web.com> <4EA83672.4060103@gmx.at>
Reply-to: tijawi@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:

> A good but unnecessary decision, because the feather never was the holotype.


Still, it can't hurt to put the issue beyond doubt.







Cheers

Tim

References:
- Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
  - From: "bh480@scn.org" <bh480@scn.org>
- Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
Next by Date: Re: Archie a bird not a dino
Previous by thread: Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
Next by thread: Re: Archaeopteryx London specimen made neotype by ICZN
Indexes: