[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged

To: dinosaur <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:00:07 -0800
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinRJNXpROowSpWfEHP_P7OBQwa1JWBH8Fx_0V+1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4CFE2160.5010201@gmx.at> <1573321071.966801291747066032.JavaMail.root@neo-mail-3>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, T. Michael Keesey <keesey@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Dinosauria", on the other hand, has no
> alternative. (Unless there's some obscure term buried in the
> historical literature that I've overlooked.)

I knew I was forgetting something: Huxley's "Ornithoscelida" could
also have worked. It's actually pretty much identical in content to
traditional Dinosauria; he only needed a different name because he had
removed Compsognathus from Dinosauria to a new group, Compsognatha.
Ornithoscelida was comprised of Dinosauria sensu Huxley and
Compsognatha.

-- 
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Flex Specialist
Glendale, California
http://tmkeesey.net/

References:
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: vultur-10@neo.tamu.edu
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Next by Date: RE: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Previous by thread: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Next by thread: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Indexes: