[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged

To: dinosaur <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:49:12 -0800
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimvHPE1PZaY+_7kqgdx1KsTmn5NqOvvW5oP0B+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4CFE2160.5010201@gmx.at> <1573321071.966801291747066032.JavaMail.root@neo-mail-3>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Following the creators of Cetartiodactyla

I ignore that one. Cetaceans are artiodactyls! (Unless they are the
extant outgroup, in which case that name becomes handy again.)

> what about "Saurornithischia"?

:|

> Or, if we like fishes (oops...) what about Dinosauroidei (or
> Dinosauroidea)? : )

That's not how those suffixes are usually used.

> It seems Dinosauria has no possibility of being discarded...

Indeed.
-- 
T. Michael Keesey
Technical Consultant and Developer, Flex Specialist
Glendale, California
http://tmkeesey.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: vultur-10@neo.tamu.edu
- Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
  - From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Next by Date: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Previous by thread: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Next by thread: Re: Sinosauropteryx filament melanosomes challenged
Indexes: