Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria

["David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

> > That's not how it works. In the ICZN, precedence does not apply
> > above the family group of ranks; the PhyloCode still isn't
> > implemented and won't be retroactive. So, do what you want.
>
> True.  But it's still at least _polite_ to follow priority of clade
> definitions in the absence of a compelling reason not to.

Yes. I should have added "but think long and hard about what you really 
want".

For example, it's not even clear whether *Prolacerta* and *Protorosaurus* 
form a clade that excludes the archosaurs...