[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: FW: Turtles in the Tree of Life
- To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
- Subject: Re: FW: Turtles in the Tree of Life
- From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 21:50:02 +0200
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- References: <001501c9d421$8befd610$a3cf8230$@com.au> <78eb35330905141007n1dece7ebrf212409237189655@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
This was evidently supposed to go to the list.
Also, I'm already familiar with the paper, having helped referee it. :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Augusto Haro" <augustoharo@gmail.com>
To: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 7:07 PM
Subject: Fwd: FW: Turtles in the Tree of Life
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Scanlon <riversleigh@outbackatisa.com.au>
Date: 2009/5/13
Subject: FW: Turtles in the Tree of Life
To: VRTPALEO@usc.edu
This will be of interest to many here, I expect; and something else for
David Marjanovic to deal with in his thesis.
The direct link to the paper is
http://www.cnah.org/pdf_files/1217.pdf
-----Original Message-----
From: CNAH [mailto:jcollins@ku.edu]
Sent: 14 May, 2009 12:01 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Turtles in the Tree of Life
CNAH ANNOUNCEMENT
The Center for North American Herpetology
Lawrence, Kansas
http://www.cnah.org
13 May 2009
TIME OF ORGANOGENESIS SUPPORT BASAL SAUROPSID POSITION OF TURTLES IN THE
AMNIOTE TREE OF LIFE
Ingmar Werneburg & Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra
2009. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9:82 (9 pages)
Abstract: The phylogenetic position of turtles is the most disputed aspect
in the reconstruction of the land vertebrate tree of life. This controversy
has arisen after many different kinds and revisions of investigations of
molecular and morphological data. Three main hypotheses of living
sister-groups of turtles have resulted from them: all reptiles, crocodiles +
birds or squamates + tuatara. Although embryology has played a major role in
morphological studies of vertebrate phylogeny, data on developmental timing
have never been examined to explore and test the alternative phylogenetic
hypotheses. We conducted a comprehensive study of published and new
embryological data comprising 15 turtle and eight tetrapod species belonging
to other taxa, integrating for the first time data on the sideneck turtle
clade. The timing of events in organogenesis of diverse character complexes
in all body regions is not uniform across amniotes and can be analysed using
a parsimony-based method. Changes in the relative timing of particular
events diagnose many clades of amniotes and include a phylogenetic signal. A
basal position of turtles to the living saurian clades is clearly supported
by timing of organogenesis data. The clear signal of a basal position of
turtles provided by heterochronic data implies significant convergence in
either molecular, adult morphological or developmental timing characters, as
only one of the alternative solutions to the phylogenetic conundrum can be
right. The development of a standard reference series of embryological
events in amniotes as presented here should enable future improvements and
expansion of sampling and thus the examination of other hypotheses about
phylogeny and patterns of the evolution of land vertebrate development.
*****
A gratis PDF of this article is available from the CNAH PDF Library at
http://www.cnah.org/cnah_pdf.asp