[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:16:33 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <9B0CA4FB-2A88-4BE0-BEA8-945E3A8055EC@att.net>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I understand that Protorosauria has precedence over Prolacertiformes.

That's not how it works. In the ICZN, precedence does not apply above the family group of ranks; the PhyloCode still isn't implemented and won't be retroactive. So, do what you want.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>

References:
- Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
  - From: David Peters <davidpeters@att.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Kinnareemimus khonkaenensis, Thailand ornithomimosaur
Next by Date: SDSM Paleo Scandal
Previous by thread: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
Next by thread: Re: Prolacertiformes and Protorosauria
Indexes: