[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...

To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:57:10 -0700
In-reply-to: <20071024051237.44FD7F4013@mail01.chariot.net.au>
References: <009f01c815b9$7951b4b0$52742690@Stratosphere> <BAY115-W29727A5541990EC0F7953598940@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 10/23/07, Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au> wrote:
>
> At the risk of encouraging another Latin grammar thread; what would be the
> more correct plural of platypus? Platypi? Platypodes?

Been there already:
http://dml.cmnh.org/1998Nov/msg00253.html

-- 
Mike Keesey

References:
- The Hunt For Red New Papers
  - From: "Jerry D. Harris" <jharris@dixie.edu>
- Platypuses may be older than we think...
  - From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
- Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Next by Date: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Previous by thread: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Next by thread: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Indexes: