[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:42:35 +0930
In-reply-to: <BAY115-W29727A5541990EC0F7953598940@phx.gbl>
References: <009f01c815b9$7951b4b0$52742690@Stratosphere> <BAY115-W29727A5541990EC0F7953598940@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Tim Williams writes:

Speaking of SVP...

http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2007/2067572.htm

Concerns _Teinolophos trusleri_ and evidence for electro-reception.

At the risk of encouraging another Latin grammar thread; what would be the more correct plural of platypus? Platypi? Platypodes?

___________________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
GIS / Archaeologist              geo cities.com/dannsdinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia             heretichides.soffiles.com
___________________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
  - From: "T. Michael Keesey" <keesey@gmail.com>
- Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
  - From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>

References:
- The Hunt For Red New Papers
  - From: "Jerry D. Harris" <jharris@dixie.edu>
- Platypuses may be older than we think...
  - From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Next by Date: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Previous by thread: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Next by thread: Re: Platypuses may be older than we think...
Indexes: