Re: Hadrosaur nomenclature

[Paleo_Mont <paleo_mont@excite.com>]

o.0....

Never heard about that. not even close to looking the same.  only thing that
can. Hmm was one paper that.... refered a digit, manus I believe to
Miasaura, that was found in the Claggot formation a few years ago. But, that
has been changed because Brachylophosaurus, also as the same line that is in
the manus as well.(forgot the technical name) I am sure someone out there
will know what i am talking about.


Anyways...thats what I have to say.


Paleo Mont
K.Wicks

On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 20:05:52 , rob_redwing@hotmail.com wrote:

>  >Maiasaura = Brachylophosaurus<
>  I admit I don't know much about hadrosaurs, so maybe this is old, but I 
>  haven't heard it before. What's the reasoning behind this?
>  Peace,
>  Rob
>  
>  
>  Student of Geology
>  Northern Arizona University
>  P.O. Box 20840
>  Flagstaff, Az. 86011
>  AIM: TarryAGoat
>  http://www.geocities.com/elvisimposter/dinopics.html
>  http://www.cafepress.com/RobsDinos
>  "A _Coelophysis_ with feathers?"
>  
>  
>  _________________________________________________________________
>  Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>  



K.Wicks
Paleo Mont - www.geocities.com/paleo_mont
Paleo Mont Park - www.geocities.com/paleo_montpark





_______________________________________________________
http://inbox.excite.com