[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Hadrosaur nomenclature

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Hadrosaur nomenclature
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:04:17 EDT
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 10/15/01 9:55:52 PM EST, dino.hunter@home.com writes:

<< Because the look similar. I'm not being smart. The Mor adult Maiasaura 
skull
 is crushed dorsal-ventrally. ROM has a new uncrushed skull that really
 really looks like Brachylophosaurus without that crest in the back. >>

Fun thought: Brachylophosaurus is a male Maiasaura (or vice versa). Boy, we 
really don't know >anything< about dinosaurs, do we?

Prev by Date: Re: birds DID NOT evolve from therapods
Next by Date: Reptilian Subclass Parareptilia?
Previous by thread: Re: Hadrosaur nomenclature
Next by thread: Re: Hadrosaur nomenclature
Indexes: