[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Paleocene dinosaurs (Ref.s)
In a message dated 10/15/01 4:53:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
Buckaroobwana@aol.com writes:
<< Greetings,
Could someone explain exactly what "reworking" means? It's always confused me.
>>
Reworking means a fossil that is eroded and redeposited in a different
context than which it originated. For instance, at the Lange-Ferguson Site (I
hope I've spelled that correctly) in South Dakota, a mammoth was killed and
butchered by Clovis hunters in the vicinity of 10,000 years ago. The event
took place in the White River Badlands of Late Eocene age. In the excavation
mammoth remains were found along with a few bits of Eocene titanothere that
had eroded out of the surrounding landscape. This is a phenomenon that is
surprisingly common, especially in regions of gradual uplift--like South
Dakota. We used to find examples in the marine deposits every once in a
while. This redeposition of fossils, of course, makes it extremely difficult,
if not impossible, to redeposit articulated skeletal remains, hence my
insistance that such be present to constitute proof of post Cretaceous
non-avian dinosaurs rather than bits and pieces that could be called
cryptopaleontology. DV