[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Haemal arch / chevrons

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Haemal arch / chevrons
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:18:47 +0100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <COL104-W161556EE42BBBE3851F1A28CCF0@phx.gbl>
References: <COL104-W161556EE42BBBE3851F1A28CCF0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

 However, is this synonymy also valid for all the vertebrates?


Yes.

...unless you want to count the h(a)emal spine as not part of theh(a)emal arch -- compare neural spine and neural arch --, but Irecommend against that.

References:
- Haemal arch / chevrons
  - From: Bernat Vila <bernat_vila@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Clarification of scope of paleoart market and other items
Next by Date: Re: Clarification of scope of paleoart market and other items
Previous by thread: Haemal arch / chevrons
Next by thread: Clarification of scope of paleoart market and other items
Indexes: