[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:06:02 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <e242.509d9695.3b62c6af@aol.com>
References: <e242.509d9695.3b62c6af@aol.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

 I suggested in the Field Guide that ovirapto[ro]saurs are secondarily
 flightless descendents of saperornids [...sapeornithids... no,
 wait... omnivoropterygids], although that requires considerable
 pelvic reversals.


Stay tuned.

References:
- Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
  - From: GSP1954@aol.com

Prev by Date: AW: Fwd: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
Next by Date: Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
Previous by thread: Re: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
Next by thread: RE: Greg Paul is right (again); or "Archie's not a birdy"
Indexes: