[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: RE: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
From: Brad McFeeters <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:35:01 -0500
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <201012161724.FGW02796@md2.mail.umd.edu>
References: <201012161724.FGW02796@md2.mail.umd.edu>
Reply-to: archosauromorph2@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

----------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:24:02 -0500
> From: tholtz@umd.edu
> To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> Subject: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera

Two new species are named, but I see only one new genus, *Dawndraco*.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
  - From: "Michael Lange" <Michael.Lange@gmx.ch>

References:
- Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>

Prev by Date: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
Next by Date: Re: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
Previous by thread: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
Next by thread: RE: Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
Indexes: