[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Kellner revises Pteranodon: new genera
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0001-37652010000400025&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=en
KELLNER, Alexander W.A.. Comments on the Pteranodontidae (Pterosauria,
Pterodactyloidea) with the description of two new species.
An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. [online]. 2010, vol.82, n.4, pp. 1063-1084. ISSN
0001-3765. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652010000400025.
Abstract
Considered one of the best known flying reptiles, Pteranodon has been subject
to several reviews in the last century. Found
exclusively in the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation and Pierre Shale Group
11 species have been attributed to this genus
(excluding the ones presently regarded as representing Nyctosaurus). While
reviewers agree that this number is inflated, there is
disagreement on how many species can be identified. The last review recognized
only two species (Pteranodon longiceps and Pteranodon
sternbergi) both being sexually dimorphic. Based on several cranial features,
some specimens previously referred to the genus
Pteranodon are re-evaluated leading to the recognition of the following
species, two of which new that are described here:
Pteranodon longiceps, Geosternbergia sternbergi, Geosternbergia maiseyi sp.
nov., and Dawndraco kanzai gen. et sp. nov. They differ
mainly by features such as the direction and extension of the frontal crest,
the angle and extension of the posterior process of the
premaxillae, the shape and extension of the lower temporal fenestra and the
length and proportion of the rostrum. The procedures to
recognize a pterosaur species are also discussed here, and must take into
account primarily morphology, in conjunction with
stratigraphic and geographic data. Although well aware that changes in
morphology not always reflect taxonomy, the lack of
stratigraphic data and the limited number of specimens that can be confidently
assigned to one species hampers our understanding on
the morphological variations as a function of ontogeny, individual variation
and sexual dimorphism. Although the present study has
not eliminated the possibility to recognize such differences, caution is needed
before models are generalized for pterosaurs.
Pdf at:
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aabc/v82n4/25.pdf
PS, a request: if this thread morphs into a discussion on etymology, PLEASE
change the subject line!!
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Email: tholtz@umd.edu Phone: 301-405-4084
Office: Centreville 1216
Senior Lecturer, Vertebrate Paleontology
Dept. of Geology, University of Maryland
http://www.geol.umd.edu/~tholtz/
Fax: 301-314-9661
Faculty Director, Science & Global Change Program, College Park Scholars
http://www.geol.umd.edu/sgc
Fax: 301-314-9843
Mailing Address: Thomas R. Holtz, Jr.
Department of Geology
Building 237, Room 1117
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742 USA