[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Sereno's (2005) new definitions



So a metataxon lacks recognizable autapomorphies (autapomorphies =
derivations common to its supposed "group").

Autapomorphies = derived characters unique to itself (auto- = self).

Metataxa of the right stratigraphic age therefore enter consideration for possibly being direct ancestors of some known clade. (For example, if *Lagosuchus* were older than *Marasuchus*, it could be its ancestor.) Unfortunately, this is the farthest we can go, except maybe in cases of an extremely good fossil record (like diatoms in the mud on the ocean floor). We can't tell, for example, whether autapomorphies were present in unpreserved parts of the organism.

Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah to all.

Same!