[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dogosaurus

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Dogosaurus
From: Nick Pharris <npharris@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:39:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <BAY11-DAV92eQvbLuc70001498a@hotmail.com>
References: <20040610134248.60518.qmail@web60104.mail.yahoo.com> <BAY11-DAV92eQvbLuc70001498a@hotmail.com>
Reply-to: npharris@umich.edu
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

Quoting Mickey Mortimer <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>:

> No, because this undescribed specimen includes hindimb elements, which are
> lacking in the new Spinostropheus material.  This "Dogosaurus" was
> previously referred to as "Sidormimus"
> (http://www.projectexploration.org/niger2000/9_15_2000.htm), though neither
> name seems likely to be the final one for the taxon.

This specimen, BTW, has been identified as a noasaurid (Sereno et al. 2004: 2).

Nick Pharris
Department of Linguistics
University of Michigan

References:
- Dogosaurus
  - From: jay nair <sappororaptor@yahoo.com>
- Re: Dogosaurus
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com>

Prev by Date: Caudipteryx papers
Next by Date: Re: T rex feathers
Previous by thread: Re: Dogosaurus
Next by thread: re: Ptero embryo, PS
Indexes: