[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Pan-clades, good or bad?

To: Mickey_Mortimer111@msn.com
Subject: RE: Pan-clades, good or bad?
From: Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 13:09:19 -0500
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
Reply-to: twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu


Mickey Mortimer wrote:

What are others' opinions on using the Pan- prefix for all stem-based
clades?  Personally, I find it terribly monotonous.

I'm not too keen on it. Panmaniraptora? Panarctometatarsalia? Panpasseriformes? Sounds like pandemonium.

_________________________________________________________________ Best Restaurant Giveaway Ever! Vote for your favorites for a chance to win $1 million! http://local.msn.com/special/giveaway.asp

Prev by Date: Re: Bigass volcanism (was RE: Human bottlenecks and bird taxonomy (was: Re: "Dinosaurs Died Within Hours...))
Next by Date: RE: Bigass volcanism (was RE: Human bottlenecks and bird taxonomy (was: Re: "Dinosaurs Died Within Hours...))
Previous by thread: RE: Re : T-Rex has no greater friend than Horner
Next by thread: Re: Pan-clades, good or bad?
Indexes: