[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Being "scientific" about segnosaurs

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Ken Kinman wrote:

>     About 6 or 7 months ago, when I knew a whole lot less about this stuff,
> Mickey Mortimer tested some alternative topologies.  He clearly showed that
> segnosauroids

Now that term is right out. It can't be used under phylogenetic taxonomy,
since it has never been defined, and it can't be used under ICZN rules,
because Therizinosauroidea has precedence.

_____________________________________________________________________________
T. MICHAEL KEESEY
 The Dinosauricon        <http://dinosauricon.com>
  BloodySteak             <http://www.bloodysteak.com>
   personal                <keesey@bigfoot.com> --> <tmk@dinosauricon.com>
    Dinosauricon-related    <dinosaur@dinosauricon.com>
     AOL Instant Messenger   <Ric Blayze>
      ICQ                     <77314901>
       Yahoo! Messenger        <Mighty Odinn>