[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: seeking clarification on the cladism debate (RE: hidden "cladistic" ranks)



Thank-you to everybody for the clarifications. (I'm halfway through the article by Benton at the moment, especially liking it's thoroughness).

>For one thing, certain traditionally paraphyletic groups, converted to
>clades, would contain other taxa of equal or even greater rank. Ordo
>Saurischia, for example, would include Classis Aves. You could reassign
>ranks, but would find very soon that you had run out of space.

Has the idea of setting points along phylogenies where the ranks are "reset" been discussed?



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com