[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Details on SVP Thursday talks and posters (Part 1)



David Marjanovic wrote-
 
Oviraptorids don't have fused nasals,
Sure?
 
Yep.  ZPAL MgD-I/95 (Osmolska, 1976), Citipati sp. and Conchoraptor (Barsbold et al., 1990) all show unfused nasals.  Jaime says there is a Conchoraptor that does have them though... things are never simple.
 
What about epipophyses on the cervicals, normally present, absent in Calamosaurus, ornithomimosaurs and troodontids and apparently not described for compsognathids? (Dirty little problem -- I don't even know what an epipophysis is. :-] )
 
Knowing what a character is is important if you want to code it.  Epipophyses are processes on the dorsal surface of the postzygopophyses.  They are usually confined to cervicals, but some taxa have them on anterior dorsals as well.  Some taxa (eg. Ceratosaurus) have very large epipophyses while others (eg. Gallimimus) have them reduced to nothing in most vertebrae.  It seems to be correlated with neck length and head size.  Ornithomimids have epipophyses on cervicals 2-4 and dorsals 1-3, and they are present in troodontids too from the axis to posterior cervicals (Makovicky, 1995).  The cervicals of Compsognathus are too broken to determine the epipophyseal morphology (Ostrom, 1978).  Calamosaurus does appear to lack them in the preserved cervical, but who knows about the rest of the vertebrae.
 
But these diagnosing characters are used to find the clades, no? So I'd expect changes in the topology?
 
ACCTRAN and DELTRAN only affect those characters with ambiguous distributions.  Given a certain topology, it makes a character diagnose a larger (ACCTRAN) or smaller (DELTRAN) clade, as long as each is equally parsimonious.  It's more complex than that, but no, it doesn't change topology.
 
I've never found [...]. Microraptor and Rahonavis sometimes form a clade, with or without Archaeopteryx.
Didn't you have that clade next to Troodontidae when you left out the flight-related characters? Or was that somebody else?
 
Oh, well maybe a no-flight-related analysis, but I don't count those as they leave out [potentially useful characters a priori.
 
Mickey Mortimer