[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Rahonavis....Both!

To: lawrence@dsuper.net
Subject: Re: Rahonavis....Both!
From: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:45:06 EST
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
Reply-to: Dinogeorge@aol.com
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

In a message dated 2/24/99 10:22:52 AM EST, lawrence@dsuper.net writes:

<< Say what?  All this does is retain the same question using different terms.
 Seeing as how it really screws around with the common term "bird", I don't
 see any advantage to this definition at all. >>

Frankly, Scarlett, I don't give a damn what they're called. Birds, schmurds.
Maybe schmurds is better; comes with no prior historical baggage. So:
dinosaurs are flightless schmurds, birds are flying schmurds, and so on.

Prev by Date: Re: Triceratops project
Next by Date: HUMOR: Gonna bag me a T-Rex!
Previous by thread: Re: Rahonavis....Both!
Next by thread: Re: Rahonavis....Both!
Indexes: