Re: Furthering Self Study

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 8/13/99 8:35:06 AM EST, s086529@student.uq.edu.au writes:

<< On the other hand, creatures that I thought were already known
 from
 way back, such as longisquama, I found out on this list has not even been
 described yet. What's with this? >>


Longisquama has been described, all right. But the specimen has not yet been 
gone over with the same scientific fine-toothed comb that has been applied to 
Archaeopteryx and a few feathered theropods.