[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Rookie Questions



In my previous post, I recommended Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs to Jessica as being written for the "general Public" but now realize that it uses a lot of terminology that is more common to the "general" scientific community. (Perhaps I should have recommended  "The Illustrated Book of Dinosaurs" for someone at her level). I tried to remember just what I knew about evolutionary biology, and what was taught about dinosaurs when I studied it in High school, and it didn`t amount to much!
 
I get a kick out of what some of these high schoolers come up with as questions. Some of them are trivial, but some of them can inspire my own sense of wonder (their minds being, as yet , unfettered by any set standards). It bothers me though to see in some of the questions a lack of understanding of some basic scientific principles. I.e. the way Caleb Lewis had a need to know some basic evolutionary facts.
 
Although I didn`t go into the teaching profession, I did accomplish my degree, and went through the student teaching, where I instructed a 7 th grade class in general science, and couldn`t believe that they were using a text that was 10 yrs old! It seemed as though nothing had changed since I went to school,...and that`s sad.
 
Now, it`s all well and good to want to keep the public "on the right track" by making sure that Information going out there is scientifically accurate, but if we really want to affect the general public, we should reach them when they are young. We should make sure they have the basic science knowledge to make good self-informed judgements as to what`s "good" and what`s "garbage". We should make sure that the science curriculum is at least up to date,  and at the very least , provide these kids with adequate libraries! I don`t see why curriculum couldn`t be organized around the study of evolution in general. It`s the perfect unifying theme, (did`nt Huxley say that?), and I think it would draw the kids attention better than memorizing all the parts of a picture of a flower (or other such nonsense). I have no contact with anyone in education at this moment, maybe some of you do. Might make for good employment for someone with the background to design a good science curriculum for various grade levels, and write a couple of good texts, don`t you think?