[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
Chris Campbell wrote:
> Jonathon Woolf wrote:
> >
> > Chris Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > > since CHRIS posted a list of horned and antlered animals where 2 out of
> > > > 5 were sexually dimorphic so that fully half that species had no antlers
> > > > whatsoever, I think CHRIS had better check his sources (like who said
> > > > what) or wind up looking etc.
> > >
> > > No, only one was sexually dimorphic. And I never said they weren't.
> > > Elk and moose, FYI, are the same animal. One's just a European name. I
> > > never said anything that was incorrect; you said that all of these
> > > animals lacked horns (or antlers, as the case may be), which is not the
> > > case.
> >
> > I think you need to find some new sources. The ones you have are giving
> > you bad
> > information.
>
> No, it's giving good info, I just didn't read the entry on Wapiti
> thoroughly enough.
>
> > The animal that North Americans call a moose (_Alces alces_) is
> > indeed a.k.a. an elk in the Old World. However, there is _also_ an animal
> > called
> > the Red Deer or Wapiti (_Cervus elaphus_), which North Americans generally
> > call
> > an Elk (note uppercase). To a North American, a moose is a moose and an
> > elk is
> > an elk, and never the twain shall meet. And both species are dimorphic,
> > with
> > only the male having antlers (not horns).
>
> Yes, WMotW confirms this. Methinks this is a cougar/mountain lion/puma
> thing. American folks call red dear, or wapiti, elk and Europeans call
> moose elk. Which elk is the real elk? The Europeans did it first, so I
> just call Moose elk when I'm dealing with Europeans and call red deer,
> uh, red deer. I can't help it if my fellow Americans like to confuse
> things. :)
>
> Chris
In Idaho a Moose and an Elk are TWO different animals. If there is any
doubt,
askthe Idaho Fish and Game, they need a good laugh. Also look in a good in
encyclopedia.
An old hunter,
Earl
.
- References:
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: "Larry Dunn" <larrydunn@hotmail.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Chris Campbell <sankarah@ou.edu>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Jonathon Woolf <jwoolf@erinet.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Chris Campbell <sankarah@ou.edu>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Jonathon Woolf <jwoolf@erinet.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Betty Cunningham <bettyc@flyinggoat.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Chris Campbell <sankarah@ou.edu>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Betty Cunningham <bettyc@flyinggoat.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Chris Campbell <sankarah@ou.edu>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Jonathon Woolf <jwoolf@erinet.com>
- Re: The absurdity, the absurdity (was: Cooperating theropods?)
- From: Chris Campbell <sankarah@ou.edu>