[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Proposed changes to ICZN

>From: tuckr@digital.net (Robert G. Tuck Jr.)
 > 
 >      Uh . . . aren't "Joe," "Betty," and "Mister" preoccupied?

'Fraid not.  Preoccupied has a rather specific technical meaning
under the ICZN, and I certainly *hope* the proposed revisions do
not include changes to those rules.  Under those rules, the above
mentioned names (plus "Barney") have not even been *published*.

swf@elsegundoca.attgis.com              sarima@netcom.com

The peace of God be with you.