Re: Proposed changes to ICZN

[Dinogeorge@aol.com]

In a message dated 95-09-11 13:45:29 EDT, swf@ElSegundoCA.ATTGIS.COM (Stan
Friesen) writes:

>From: tuckr@digital.net (Robert G. Tuck Jr.)
> > 
> >      Uh . . . aren't "Joe," "Betty," and "Mister" preoccupied?
>
>'Fraid not.  Preoccupied has a rather specific technical meaning
>under the ICZN, and I certainly *hope* the proposed revisions do
>not include changes to those rules.  Under those rules, the above
>mentioned names (plus "Barney") have not even been *published*.

That is my understanding.

G.O.