[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: polacanthus
Dough! Ken sent mail to me on two different accounts, and I didn't
see this until after I'd already included his other message. The
following is Ken Carpenter's response to Tom Holtz' response to Darren
Naish:
>>NEW ANKYLOSAURS AND THEIR SHORT LEGS
>>
>> OK, OK.... yes, ankylosaurs (particularly some nodosaurids) have
>> short arms - but not legs! Mymoorapelta maysi is the name given to
>> Kirkland's new Morrison ankylosaur. It has short arms. An exciting
>> new possibilty (currently being written up by ?Carpenter and others)
No, by Kirkland.
>> is that 'nodosaurids' with big, lateral tail spikes belong to a
>> different family - the Polacanthidae. This was previously diagnosed
>> in the 19th century but since been sunk into Nodosauridae. It would
>> include Mymoorapelta, Polacanthus and ?Sauropelta...
>
> Can anyone actually find the original proposal for "Polacanthidae"?
> When I last talked to Jim, and to George Olshevsky, both agreed
> that the name was floating around out there, but neither could find
> the original citation.
The first use (undiagnosed) was aparently Weiland in 1911 (Notes on
the armored dinosaurs Amer. J. Sci. 31, p. 118). I doubt the name is
valid because it has not been widely accepted, and besides, it was not
even used in conjunction with Polacanthus, but listed with several
other families.
> And actually, where does Acanthopholis (and the Acanthopholidae)
> belong in the newer ankylosaurian phylogenies? Comments from anky
> workers most appreciated.
Good question. I'll wait until a revision of Acanthopholis is
completed.
> I think Sauropelta seems to be more similar to more typical Late K
> Nodosauridae, and so probably will remain a nodosaurid.
True
>> I understand that Kirkland has just discovered another new Morrison
>> ankylosaur, which has now been named. Can anyone help?
>
> I don't know about another Morrison one, but Kirkland has a
> "polacanthid" from the Cedar Mountain (Aptian-Albian) which is
> going to be named Gastonia.
True also.