Re: speculation/testability Pt. II (peer review)

[Crpntr@ix.netcom.com (Kenneth Carpenter)]

Mickey Rowe wrote:

> Ken, if I took a species of dinosaur
>for which no hint of sexual dimorphism had ever been found, and then
>argued that it must have been a parthenogenetic species (a la some
>whiptailed lizards) would you think it worthy of publication?  Say
>yes, and I'll submit to JVP with you as a suggested reviewer ;-)  
>


so write it up and we'll see how you develop your arguments.