[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Tetrapod temporal skull region + Arundelemys cranial anatomy + more




Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

Some recent tetrapod-related papers:


Free pdf:

Pascal Abel & Ingmar Werneburg (2021)
Morphology of the temporal skull region in tetrapods: research history, functional explanations, and a new comprehensive classification scheme.
Biological Reviews (advance online publication)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12751
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.12751

Free pdf:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/brv.12751


The morphology of the temporal region in the tetrapod skull traditionally has been a widely discussed feature of vertebrate anatomy. The evolution of different temporal openings in Amniota (mammals, birds, and reptiles), Lissamphibia (frogs, salamanders, and caecilians), and several extinct tetrapod groups has sparked debates on the phylogenetic, developmental, and functional background of this region in the tetrapod skull. This led most famously to the erection of different amniote taxa based on the number and position of temporal fenestrae in their skulls. However, most of these taxa are no longer recognised to represent natural groupings and the morphology of the temporal region is not necessarily an adequate trait for use in the reconstruction of amniote phylogenies. Yet, new fossil finds, most notably of parareptiles and stem-turtles, as well as modern embryological and biomechanical studies continue to provide new insights into the morphological diversity of the temporal region. Here, we introduce a novel comprehensive classification scheme for the various temporal morphotypes in all Tetrapoda that is independent of phylogeny and previous terminology and may facilitate morphological comparisons in future studies. We then review the history of research on the temporal region in the tetrapod skull. We document how, from the early 19th century with the first recognition of differences in the temporal region to the first proposals of phylogenetic relationships and their assessment over the centuries, the phylogenetic perspective on the temporal region has developed, and we highlight the controversies that still remain. We also compare the different functional and developmental drivers proposed for the observed morphological diversity and how the effects of internal and external factors on the structure of the tetrapod skull have been interpreted.

=====

AndrÃs Liker, Veronika BÃkony, Ivett Pipoly, Jean-Francois LemaÃtre, Jean-Michel Gaillard, TamÃs SzÃkely & Robert P. Freckleton (2021)
Evolution of large males is associated with female-skewed adult sex ratios in amniotes.
Evolution (advance onlineÂpublication)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14273
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/evo.14273


Body size often differs between the sexes (leading to sexual size dimorphism, SSD), as a consequence of differential responses by males and females to selection pressures. Adult sex ratio (the proportion of males in the adult population, ASR) should influence SSD because ASR relates to both the number of competitors and available mates, which shape the intensity of mating competition and thereby promotes SSD evolution. However, whether ASR correlates with SSD variation among species has not been yet tested across a broad range of taxa. Using phylogenetic comparative analyses of 462 amniotes (i.e. reptiles, birds and mammals), we fill this knowledge gap by showing that male bias in SSD increases with increasingly female-biased ASRs in both mammals and birds. This relationship is not explained by the higher mortality of the larger sex because SSD is not associated with sex differences in either juvenile or adult mortality. Phylogenetic path analysis indicates that higher mortality in one sex leads to skewed ASR, which in turn may generate selection for SSD biased towards the rare sex. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that skewed ASRs in amniote populations can result in the rarer sex evolving large size to capitalize on enhanced mating opportunities.

===

Free pdf:

Serjoscha W. Evers, Yann Rollot & Walter G. Joyce (2021)
New interpretation of the cranial osteology of the Early Cretaceous turtle Arundelemys dardeni (Paracryptodira) based on a CT-based re-evaluation of the holotype.
PeerJ 9:e11495
doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11495
https://peerj.com/articles/11495/


Arundelemys dardeni is an Early Cretaceous paracryptodire known from a single, incomplete, but generally well-preserved skull. Phylogenetic hypotheses of paracryptodires often find Arundelemys dardeni as an early branching baenid. As such, it has a central role in understanding the early evolution of the successful clade Baenidae, which survived the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction, as well as the diversification of Paracryptodira into its subclades, which recent research suggests to perhaps include helochelydrids, compsemydids, pleurosternids, and baenids. Computer tomography scans of the holotype material that were produced for the initial description of Arundelemeys dardeni reveal several errors in the initial anatomical description of the species, which we correct based on element-by-element segmentation. In addition, we provide entirely novel anatomical information, including descriptions of several previously undescribed cranial bones, the endosseous labyrinth, and the cranial scutes, the latter of which are unknown for most paracryptodires. We provide an interpretation of cranial scutes which homologizes the scutes of Arundelemys dardeni with those of other stem turtles.

=====
Free pdf:

Robyn A. Grant & Victor G. A. Goss (2021)
What can whiskers tell us about mammalian evolution, behaviour, and ecology?
Mammal Review (advance online publication)
doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12253
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mam.12253

Free pdf:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mam.12253

Most mammals have whiskers; however, nearly everything we know about whiskers derives from just a handful of species, including laboratory rats Rattus norvegicus and mice Mus musculus, as well as some species of pinniped and marsupial.

We explore the extent to which the knowledge of the whisker system from a handful of species applies to mammals generally. This will help us understand whisker evolution and function, in order to gain more insights into mammalian behaviour and ecology.

This review is structured around Tinbergenâs four questions, since this method is an established, comprehensive, and logical approach to studying behaviour. We ask: how do whiskers work, develop, and evolve? And what are they for?

While whiskers are all slender, curved, tapered, keratinised hairs that transmit vibrotactile information, we show that there are marked differences between species with respect to whisker arrangement, numbers, length, musculature, development, and growth cycles.

The conservation of form and a common muscle architecture in mammals suggests that early mammals had whiskers. Whiskers may have been functional even in therapsids.

However, certain extant mammalian species are equipped with especially long and sensitive whiskers, in particular nocturnal, arboreal species, and aquatic species, which live in complex environments and hunt moving prey.

Knowledge of whiskers and whisker use can guide us in developing conservation protocols and designing enriched enclosures for captive mammals.

We suggest that further comparative studies, embracing a wider variety of mammalian species, are required before one can make large-scale predictions relating to evolution and function of whiskers. More research is needed to develop robust techniques to enhance the welfare and conservation of mammals.


====
====

Abstract only for now:

Julien Benoit, Claire Browning and Luke Allan Norton (2021)
The first healed bite mark and embedded tooth in the snout of a middle Permian gorgonopsian (Synapsida: Therapsida).
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (abstract only)
doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.699298
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.699298/abstract


Despite their significance for paleobiological interpretations, bite marks have been rarely reported in non-mammalian therapsids. Here we describe, for the first time, the occurrence of a tooth embedded in the snout of a gorgonopsian. The tooth is surrounded by a bony callus, which demonstrates that the animal was still alive after the attack and healed. The identity of the attacker is unknown. Two hypotheses are discussed to account for this healed bite: failed predation (most likely by a biarmosuchian, therocephalian, or another gorgonopsian) and intraspecific social biting. Though predation cannot be ruled out, it has been hypothesized that gorgonopsians used their saber-like teeth for social signaling, which suggests that social biting may be the most likely scenario. The practice of social biting has long been hypothesized in non-mammalian therapsids, but this is the first fossilized evidence of the behavior to be described.

===








Virus-free. www.avg.com