[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Ammonite brachial (arm) crown reconstructed + more




Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

Okay, it's way too early for Cephalopod Awareness Week (in October), but I'll post these non-tetrapod cephalopod items anyway, especially since what the soft-tissue arms of ammonites looked like has been a puzzle and paleoartists often include ammonites in their recreations of Mesozoic marine reptiles....Â

Free pdf:

C. P. A. Smith, N. H. Landman, J. Bardin & I. Kruta (2021)
New evidence from exceptionally "well-preserved" specimens sheds light on the structure of the ammonite brachial crown.
Scientific Reports 11, Article number: 11862
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89998-4
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-89998-4

Free pdf:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-89998-4.pdf


Ammonite soft body remains are rarely preserved. One of the biggest enigmas is the morphology of the ammonite brachial crown that has, up till now, never been recovered. Recently, mysterious hook-like structures have been reported in multiple specimens of Scaphitidae, a large family of heteromorph Late Cretaceous ammonites. A previous examination of these structures revealed that they belong to the ammonites. Their nature, however, remained elusive. Here, we exploit tomographic data to study their arrangement in space in order to clarify this matter. After using topological data analyses and comparing their morphology, number, and distribution to other known cephalopod structures, in both extant and extinct taxa, we conclude that these hook-like structures represent part of the brachial crown armature. Therefore, it appears that there are at least three independent evolutionary origins of hooks: in belemnoids, oegospids, and now in ammonites. Finally, we propose for the first time a hypothetical reconstruction of an ammonite brachial crown.

====


Free pdf:

Xu Dai, Dieter Korn & Haijun Song (2021)
Morphological selectivity of the Permian-Triassic ammonoid mass extinction
Geology (advance online publication)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G48788.1
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article/doi/10.1130/G48788.1/600700/Morphological-selectivity-of-the-Permian-Triassic

Free pdf:
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geology/article-pdf/doi/10.1130/G48788.1/5323522/g48788.pdf

[NOTE: I had some problems getting the free pdf to download. It took multiple tries..]



Ammonoids suffered a diversity bottleneck during the Permian-Triassic mass extinction (PTME) and experienced a rapid diversification in the Early Triassic. However, the kinds of ammonoids that were more likely to survive the PTME and that fueled subsequent diversification are still poorly known. We compiled a comprehensive morphological data set and used the nonmetric multidimensional scaling method to reveal the impact of the PTME on the morphological selectivity of ammonoids. Our results show that postextinction taxa occupied a quite different morphospace when compared with the pre-extinction assemblages. The survivors were mainly smooth and weakly ornamented forms, while the late Permian species were dominated by coarsely ornamented forms. Contrary to previously recognized nonselective patterns, these results suggest a morphological selectivity of the Permian-Triassic crisis. Newcomers in the Griesbachian were mainly compressed and smooth forms. This morphological shift from the coarsely ornamented ammonoids dominating the Changhsingian to the smooth ammonoids dominating the Griesbachian possibly suggests an ecological turnover of ammonoids during the PTME.

==

Also:

Where Are All The Squid Fossils?Â

[mentions ammonites and suggests why their soft tissues are so rarely fossilized as well...]

PBS Eons (video)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL-K7yuhSxA



Virus-free. www.avg.com