[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] Coining names



Good point, I hadn't known the date of naming. Nopcsa named it *Titanosaurus dacus* after the ancient peoples of the area. The Transylvanian region is still home to a large Magyar population. I wonder if Romanians are miffed that "their" dinosaur is named after a different ethnic group? "Romani(a)saurus" isn't taken...

Thomas Yazbeck


From: dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu <dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu> on behalf of Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 1:18 AM
To: dinosaur-l@usc.edu <dinosaur-l@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Coining names
 
Thomas Yazbeck <yazbeckt@msu.edu> wrote:

> Incidentally, another example of the place-name mismatch in dinosaur taxonomy is *Magyarosaurus*, named by Nopcsa back when Transylvania was part of Hungary (now Romania).

I believe _Magyarosaurus_ was named by Huene after the Magyar people,
rather than a place (Hungary/Magyarország).  When _Magyarosaurus_ was
named (1932), Transylvania (including the Hateg Basin) was part of
Romania, as a consequence of the collapse of the Dual Monarchy (Treaty
of Versailles, and all that).