[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Avian flight feathers + La Brea avifauna + bird morphological form to ecological function




Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

Recent avian papers:

Free pdf:

Laura Y. Matloff, Eric Chang, Teresa J. Feo, Lindsie Jeffries, Amanda K. Stowers, Cole Thomson & David Lentink (2020)
How flight feathers stick together to form a continuous morphing wing.
Science Â367(6475): 293-297
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz3358
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6475/293

Free pdf:
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6475/293.full.pdf

Wing shapes take flight

Birds can dynamically alter the shape of their wings during flight, although how this is accomplished is poorly understood. Matloff et al. found that two mechanisms control the movement of the individual feathers. Whenever the skeleton moves, the feathers are redistributed passively through compliance of the elastic connective tissue at the feather base. To prevent the feathers from spreading too far apart, hook-shaped microstructures on adjacent feathers form a directional fastener that locks adjacent feathers. These features are found across a range of bird sizes; however, because the detachment of the hooks is noisy, they are notably absent in silent fliers, such as barn owls.

Abstract

Variable feather overlap enables birds to morph their wings, unlike aircraft. They accomplish this feat by means of elastic compliance of connective tissue, which passively redistributes the overlapping flight feathers when the skeleton moves to morph the wing planform. Distinctive microstructures form âdirectional Velcro,â such that when adjacent feathers slide apart during extension, thousands of lobate cilia on the underlapping feathers lock probabilistically with hooked rami of overlapping feathers to prevent gaps. These structures unlock automatically during flexion. Using a feathered biohybrid aerial robot, we demonstrate how both passive mechanisms make morphing wings robust to turbulence. We found that the hooked microstructures fasten feathers across bird species except silent fliers, whose feathers also lack the associated Velcro-like noise. These findings could inspire innovative directional fasteners and morphing aircraft.

====

Free pdf:

Robert M. Zink, Sebastian Botero-CaÃola, Helen Martinez & Katelyn M. Herzberg (2020)
Niche modeling reveals life history shifts in birds at La Brea over the last twenty millennia.
PLoS ONE 15(1): e0227361.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227361
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227361

Free pdf
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227361

A species presence at a particular site can change over time, resulting in temporally dynamic species pools. Ecological niche models provide estimates of species presence at different time intervals. The avifauna of La Brea includes approximately 120 species dating to approximately 15,000 years ago. Niche models predicted presence at the Last Glacial Maximum for over 90% of 89 landbird species. This confirms that niche modeling produces sensible range estimates at the Last Glacial Maximum. For 97 currently local species that are as yet undocumented at La Brea over 90% were predicted to occur; absence is due to insufficient study, lack of the ecological niche, transient occurrence or a behavioral ability to avoid entrapment. Our 366 niche models provide a prospective checklist of the landbird fauna of La Brea. The models indicate fluidity in life history strategies and a higher proportion of resident birds at the LGM (88% to 60%). We evaluated a subset of 103 species in breeding and winter periods using two climate models (MIROCâESM, CCSM4) with a variety of differing parameters, finding differences in 5% of the niche models. Niche breadths in bark-foraging birds changed little between the present and LGM, suggesting that greater species diversity at the LGM was due to greater niche availability rather than contractions of niche breadths (i.e., niche partitioning).

===

Nathalie Seddon, Christopher H. Trisos, Brian C. Weeks & Joseph A. Tobias (2020)
Macroevolutionary convergence connects morphological form to ecological function in birds.
Nature Ecology & Evolution
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1070-4
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-019-1070-4


Animals have diversified into a bewildering variety of morphological forms exploiting a complex configuration of trophic niches. Their morphological diversity is widely used as an index of ecosystem function, but the extent to which animal traits predict trophic niches and associated ecological processes is unclear. Here we use the measurements of nine key morphological traits for >99% bird species to show that avian trophic diversity is described by a trait space with four dimensions. The position of species within this space maps with 70â85% accuracy onto major niche axes, including trophic level, dietary resource type and finer-scale variation in foraging behaviour. Phylogenetic analyses reveal that these formâfunction associations reflect convergence towards predictable trait combinations, indicating that morphological variation is organized into a limited set of dimensions by evolutionary adaptation. Our results establish the minimum dimensionality required for avian functional traits to predict subtle variation in trophic niches and provide a global framework for exploring the origin, function and conservation of bird diversity.

News:

http://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/194608/global-database-bird-species-shows-body/

https://phys.org/news/2020-01-global-database-bird-species-body.html