[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] Trematopid (Temnospondyli) ontogenetic disparity, effect on phylogeny



ÂA blog post from Bryan Gee:

New publication: Size matters: the effects of ontogenetic disparity on the phylogeny of Trematopidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) (Gee; Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society)


https://bryangee.weebly.com/blog/new-publication-size-matters-the-effects-of-ontogenetic-disparity-on-the-phylogeny-of-trematopidae-amphibia-temnospondyli-gee-zoological-journal-of-the-linnean-society

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:38 PM Ben Creisler <bcreisler@gmail.com> wrote:

Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

A new paper:


Bryan M. Gee (2020)
Size matters: the effects of ontogenetic disparity on the phylogeny of Trematopidae (Amphibia: Temnospondyli)
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society: zlz170 (advance online publication)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz170
https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz170/5741763


Trematopids are a clade of terrestrial Permo-Carboniferous temnospondyl amphibians. The intrarelationships of this clade are poorly known. This is largely attributable to a substantial disparity in size between type specimens, which range from the small-bodied lectotype of Mattauschia laticeps (< 4 cm skull length) to the large-bodied holotype of Acheloma cumminsi (> 15 cm skull length). Inferred correlation of size disparity with ontogenetic disparity has led previous workers either to omit taxa in phylogenetic analyses or to forgo an analysis altogether. Here, I take a specimen-level approach and multiple subsampling permutations to explore the phylogeny of the Trematopidae as a case study for assessing the effects of ontogenetic disparity on phylogenetic reconstruction in temnospondyls. The various analyses provide evidence that ontogenetic disparity confounds the phylogenetic inference of trematopids but without a directional bias. Tree topologies of most permutations are poorly resolved and weakly supported, reflecting character conflict that results from the inability of the analyses to differentiate retained plesiomorphies from juvenile features. These findings urge caution in the interpretation of phylogenetic analyses for which ontogenetic disparity exists, but is unaccounted for, and provide a strong impetus for more directed exploration of the interplay of ontogeny and phylogeny across Temnospondyli.