Ben Creisler
Some recent non-dino papers;
[NO ABSTRACT]Â
====
Free pdf:
Free pdf:
The evolution of upright limb posture in mammals may have enabled modifications of the forelimb for diverse locomotor ecologies. A rich fossil record of non-mammalian synapsids holds the key to unraveling the transition from "sprawling" to "erect" limb function in the precursors to mammals, but a detailed understanding of muscle functional anatomy is a necessary prerequisite to reconstructing postural evolution in fossils. Here we characterize the gross morphology and internal architecture of muscles crossing the shoulder joint in two morphologically-conservative extant amniotes that form a phylogenetic and morpho-functional bracket for non-mammalian synapsids: the Argentine black and white tegu Salvator merianae and the Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana. By combining traditional physical dissection of cadavers with nondestructive three-dimensional digital dissection, we find striking similarities in muscle organization and architectural parameters. Despite the wide phylogenetic gap between our study species, distal muscle attachments are notably similar, while differences in proximal muscle attachments are driven by modifications to the skeletal anatomy of the pectoral girdle that are well-documented in transitional synapsid fossils. Further, correlates for force production, physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA), muscle gearing (pennation), and working range (fascicle length) are statistically indistinguishable for an unexpected number of muscles. Functional tradeoffs between force production and working range reveal muscle specializations that may facilitate increased girdle mobility, weight support, and active stabilization of the shoulder in the opossum--a possible signal of postural transformation. Together, these results create a foundation for reconstructing the musculoskeletal anatomy of the non-mammalian synapsid pectoral girdle with greater confidence, as we demonstrate by inferring shoulder muscle PCSAs in the fossil non-mammalian cynodont Massetognathus pascuali.
==========
Free pdf:
Free pdf:
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/706305Evolutionary innovations and ecological competition are factors often cited as drivers of adaptive diversification. Yet many innovations result in stabilizing rather than diversifying selection on morphology, and morphological disparity among coexisting species can reflect competitive exclusion (species sorting) rather than sympatric adaptive divergence (character displacement). We studied the innovation of gliding in dragons (Agamidae) and squirrels (Sciuridae) and its effect on subsequent body size diversification. We found that gliding either had no impact (squirrels) or resulted in strong stabilizing selection on body size (dragons). Despite this constraining effect in dragons, sympatric gliders exhibit greater size disparity compared with allopatric gliders, a pattern consistent with, although not exclusively explained by, ecological competition changing the adaptive landscape of body size evolution to induce character displacement. These results show that innovations do not necessarily instigate further differentiation among species, as is so often assumed, and suggest that competition can be a powerful force generating morphological divergence among coexisting species, even in the face of strong stabilizing selection.
News:
How gliding animals fine-tuned the rules of evolution
===
Anna M. Zavodszky & Gabrielle A. Russo (2020)
Comparative and functional morphology of chevron bones among mammals.
Journal of Mammalogy, gyaa010
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa010https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa010/5739765Tail morphology and function vary considerably across mammals. While studies of the mammalian tail have paid increasing attention to the caudal vertebrae, the chevron bones, ventrally positioned elements that articulate with the caudal vertebrae of most species and that serve to protect blood vessels and provide attachment sites for tail flexor musculature, have largely been ignored. Here, morphological variation in chevron bones is documented systematically among mammals possessing different tail locomotor functions, including prehensility, terrestrial propulsion (use for pentapedal locomotion), and postural prop, during which chevron bones are presumably under different mechanical stresses or serve different mechanical roles. Several chevron bone morphotypes were identified along the tail, varying both within and between tail regions. While some morphotypes were present across many or all clades surveyed, other morphotypes were clade-specific. Chevron bone dorsoventral height was examined at key vertebral levels among closely related species with different tail locomotor functions to assess whether variation followed any functional patterns. Dorsoventral height of chevron bones differed between prehensile- and nonprehensile-tailed, prop-tailed and nonprop-tailed, and pentapedal and nonpentapedal mammals. However, small sample sizes precluded rigorous statistical analyses. Distinctions were also qualified among species (not grouped by tail locomotor function), and the utility of metrics for quantifying specific aspects of chevron bone anatomy is discussed. This study offers information about the functional morphology of mammalian tails and has implications for reconstructing tail function in the fossil record.