[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Eodelphis (Late Cretaceous metatherian) feeding evolution




Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

A new paper:

Alexandria L. Brannick & Gregory P. Wilson (2020)
New Specimens of the Late Cretaceous Metatherian Eodelphis and the Evolution of Hard-Object Feeding in the Stagodontidae.
Journal of Mammalian Evolution 27: 1-16
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-018-9451-z
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10914-018-9451-z


The Stagodontidae include the largest metatherians known from the Cretaceous of North America. Of the recognized species of the stagodontid genus Eodelphis, E. cutleri is larger and has a more robust dentary, more inflated premolars, and third premolars specialized for crushing, as opposed to the more gracile E. browni. These differences have led to the hypothesis that an E. cutleri-like ancestor gave rise to Didelphodonâanother, mostly younger, stagodontid, which has been interpreted as a durophagous predator-scavenger. If correct, E. cutleri would be expected to show more morphological adaptation toward durophagy than E. browni does. Here, we describe two new dentary fossils referable to E. browni and test the evolutionary hypothesis by applying beam theory to estimate bending force capabilities of 22 dentaries of Cretaceous stagodontids and other metatherians. The resulting diversity of bending force profiles of the sampled dentaries implies that Cretaceous metatherians had a wide range of feeding behaviors. Among the stagodontids, E. cutleri has a mediolateral bending force profile of the dentary that is more similar to that of Didelphodon than it is to that of E. browni; whereas its dorsoventral bending force profile is more similar to that of E. browni. These results indicate that anteriorly the dentary of E. cutleri was capable of resisting high torsional stresses from hard-object feeding but lacked other dorsoventral buttressing associated with exceptionally high bite forces of Didelphodon. Our results imply that some morphological changes associated with durophagy evolved twice within this clade, independently in E. cutleri and Didelphodon.