[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs

To: dinosaur-l@usc.edu
Subject: Re: [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:24:39 +1100
Delivered-to: dinosaur-l@mymaillists.usc.edu
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=5C90EqxTQQLla4tBcgjyxT5J2PM1EkyHafrv6EvBOto=; b=La6foe0ixJzRQrUCE5zHFdGE8BLeBa4WNzsi/h3KnrWJS+rVAaDzhf3WIC8zwQfOat tNdnJRQdCRTXfwg5jm+IL9tm/anM8v7Lc9Ndg1EJR3KyM5OYmoBu86TDggn6oOKdEHbs 9VOWOF2bJRPmNtjptR1hvFf20WUGhq4U+AIDHHIG8N585D/IbfO+H3STfuTqlQw4FWaE yGpMht9tmcSohl0Vpxlh5LIaNbsGaz9gxx4K6rhvh7EySVR7CclEzxWOPSFWN5LcZ619 wbb2l/NfKHCrMf+qAadTCFubb1oexSqBgxWEuJORljFmA/DslP8Nu7nqfhm19ju8sUFB pBSA==
In-reply-to: <01a501d59ced$944527c0$bccf7740$@cox.net>
List-archive: <http://mymaillists.usc.edu/sympa/arc/dinosaur-l>
List-help: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: <dinosaur-l.mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-owner: <mailto:dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:dinosaur-l@mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-subscribe: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=subscribe%20dinosaur-l>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=unsubscribe%20dinosaur-l>
References: <3fq.3fvSy.57kso8wQF}4.1Tp}OQ@seznam.cz> <YTOPR0101MB1898045B2ADC24CCD938A5CA98730@YTOPR0101MB1898.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <01a501d59ced$944527c0$bccf7740$@cox.net>
Reply-to: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Sender: dinosaur-l-request@usc.edu

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 1:20 PM <john-schneiderman@cox.net> wrote:

> 2002       Rutellum impicatum  < ha ha!

Playing it straight here... 'Rutellum impicatum' was "named" in 1699.
It's a tooth, probably from a cetiosaurid, mentioned by Delair and
Sarjeant (2002).  Like 'Scrotum humanum' (the famously 'well-hung'
megalosaur) I doubt 'Rutellum impicatum' qualifies as an official
binomen.

_Epidendrosaurus_/_Scansoriopteryx_ was named in 2002.  Due to its
weirdness (though it seems less weird now, or at least weird for
different reasons), it was one of the more newsworthy fossil
discoveries of that year.... taking nothing away from
_Incisivosaurus_, _Sinovenator_, _Anabisetia_, _Liaoceratops_, etc.

References:
- [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs
  - From: Poekilopleuron <dinosaurtom2015@seznam.cz>
- Re: [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs
  - From: Brad McFeeters <archosauromorph2@hotmail.com>
- RE: [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs
  - From: <john-schneiderman@cox.net>

Prev by Date: [dinosaur] Titanosaurs + Haplocanthosaurus + iguanodontians + more
Next by Date: [dinosaur] Sauropod paleoneurological study, phylogenetic significance (free pdf)
Previous by thread: RE: [dinosaur] The most popular dinosaurs
Next by thread: [dinosaur] Pachyophiid vertebral inner structure to an aquatic life (free pdf)
Indexes: