Re: [dinosaur] 21st-century ethics was Re: Tyrannosaurus + Torosaurus + robot design + more

["David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

Gesendet:ÂMittwoch, 10. Oktober 2018 um 18:10 Uhr
Von:Â"John D'Angelo" <assuming.dinosaur@gmail.com>

> The edit in question which got removed was to state, in the body of the 
> article text, "the following has been blatantly plagiarized" with a link to 
> the blog at the beginning of the offending section. No accusations of "not 
> being a known Wikipedia editor" were made, and the edit seems to have been 
> removed because it got flagged as vandalism or something. In any case, 
> criticisms like this get a citation needed or go in the talk page, not the 
> body of the text itself.

Oh. I agree.

I also agree that *Leogorgon* shouldn't get a page of its own, but rather a 
redirect to its senior synonym (and maybe get a paragraph or two there if it's 
notable enough).

> Ivakhnenko MF. 2003. Eotherapsids from the East European Placket (Late 
> Permian). Paleontological Journal 37:S339âS465.

Doesn't seem to exist anywhere online.