[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT

To: dinosaur-l@usc.edu
Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:04:53 +1100
Delivered-to: dinosaur-l@mymaillists.usc.edu
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1rl8mu9UYX2Knj9O/IgERcePrBcI6md1O28TYucxZMg=; b=Di/Mbx2ZyWjrkfsn34JpTTbJ8Kjh58RXTi4ZOrw4swuk7pSLET5Zy/Cm/GC5R2RvVs RvgkMUOUM33l6UbHK4HYaNt2EJM4Srw1RZ2r5MQDsWOtQq3tvYPuOaYE8Iu6A5k3zXuX WBVPG1G6nsPAv2mX886BGIBBKfy9Im7IAqCd7/51c4zj7DtODfwvUHDcOS0BWQaOR7Pz ol3ySEJnwwpqKFPTwpxmaxo+HlcVLwsYw2WnaoK6hF+3To0fDdscqvdkaIMIXnjfBtrC Rlwx9oxNJ/4d2nLkUvlSsJnL4ljg7ngkjsLuv5NEfZvSPKAvPPQJiDa0zb3NCJSap4Pa 36dQ==
In-reply-to: <trinity-ff058cb4-c5d2-41fd-a3bf-db2dad209485-1520976560728@3c-app-gmx-bs33>
List-archive: <http://mymaillists.usc.edu/sympa/arc/dinosaur-l>
List-help: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: <dinosaur-l.mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-owner: <mailto:dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:dinosaur-l@mymaillists.usc.edu>
List-subscribe: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=subscribe%20dinosaur-l>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@mymaillists.usc.edu?subject=unsubscribe%20dinosaur-l>
References: <1692399706.10154.1520970134440@myemail.cox.net> <trinity-ff058cb4-c5d2-41fd-a3bf-db2dad209485-1520976560728@3c-app-gmx-bs33>
Reply-to: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Sender: dinosaur-l-request@usc.edu

David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:

> Second... I thought *Manospondylus* was a nomen oblitum and *Tyrannosaurus* a 
> nomen protectum?

There's been no formal declaration, AFAIK.  But effectively, yes:
_Manospondylus_ is a _nomen oblitum_ and _Tyrannosaurus_ is a _nomen
protectum_ (to invoke common law, this status is _de facto_ more so
than _de jure_).

Brochu (2003) has dealt with the _Tyrannosaurus_ vs _Manospondylus_
issue (DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2003.10010947).  Long story short:
_Manospondylus_ is toast.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

References:
- [dinosaur] RE {dinosaur] IGNORING A DEINODONT
  - From: John Schneiderman <john-schneiderman@cox.net>
- [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: Re: [dinosaur] Hovurlestes, new eutherian mammal from Early Cretaceous of Mongolia + Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology
Next by Date: Re: [dinosaur] Archaeopteryx had active flapping flight ability based on wing bone geometry (free pdf)
Previous by thread: [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT
Next by thread: Re: [dinosaur] Public service announcement was IGNORING A DEINODONT
Indexes: