[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 17:51:24 +1000
In-reply-to: <743341102.5894702.1440312492948.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <743341102.5894702.1440312492948.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: tijawi@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Allosaurs could use their arms to swipe at close range?

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Hammer <hammeris1@att.net> wrote:
> "Because they could"?  Any theories?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
  - From: Michael Habib <biologyinmotion@gmail.com>

References:
- so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
  - From: Hammer <hammeris1@att.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Pterygornis, new enantiornithine bird from Jehol Biota of China
Next by Date: Re: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
Previous by thread: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
Next by thread: Re: so, why was face-biting so much more prevalent in tyrannosaurs than allosaurs?
Indexes: