[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
AW: Moa-Tinamou Clade Found Within Ratites
Did anyone count how often paleognath phylogeny was "resolved" yet?
And do Baker et al (2014) address the concerns of Smith et al (2013)
http://people.biology.ufl.edu/rkimball/publications_files/Smithetal.2013.SystBio.pdf,
Kimball et al (2013?)
http://people.biology.ufl.edu/rkimball/publications_files/Kimballetal.MPE.uncorrectedproofs.pdf
and Yuri et al (2013)
http://people.biology.ufl.edu/rkimball/publications_files/Yurietal.2013.Biology.pdf
regarding the need to test any
"new phylogenomic sequences from 1,448 nuclear DNA loci totalling almost one
million base pairs"
(and RGCs just as well) on whether they actually retain phylogenetic signal?
An additional question: considering we have no problems getting the artificial
(Paleognaths,(Passerines,other neognaths)) or
(Paleognaths,(Galloanseres,(Passerines,other Neoaves))) quite robustly
supported - how can we be sure (Ostrich,other paleognaths) is not artificial?
Regards,
Eike
--------------------------------------------
Ben Creisler <bcreisler@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi, 14.5.2014:
Betreff: Moa-Tinamou Clade Found Within Ratites
An: dinosaur@usc.edu
Datum: Mittwoch, 14. Mai, 2014 04:24 Uhr
From: Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com
Here's the citation and link for the new paper on ratite
evolution:
Allan J. Baker, Oliver Haddrath, John D. McPherson and
Alison Cloutier (2014)
Genomic Support for a Moa-Tinamou Clade and Adaptive
Morphological
Convergence in Flightless Ratites.
Molecular Biology and Evolution (advance online
publication)
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu153
http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/05/09/molbev.msu153.abstract
One of the most startling discoveries in avian molecular
phylogenetics
is that the volant tinamous are embedded in the flightless
ratites,
but this topology remains controversial because recent
morphological
phylogenies place tinamous as the closest relative of a
monophyletic
ratite clade. Here, we integrate new phylogenomic sequences
from 1,448
nuclear DNA loci totalling almost one million base pairs
from the
extinct little bush moa, Chilean tinamou and emu with
available
sequences from ostrich, elegant crested tinamou, four
neognaths and
the green anole. Phylogenetic analysis using standard
homogeneous
models and heterogeneous models robust to common topological
artefacts
recovered compelling support for ratite paraphyly with the
little bush
moa closest to tinamous within ratites. Ratite paraphyly was
further
corroborated by eight independent CR1 retroposon insertions.
Analysis
of morphological characters reinterpreted on a 27-gene
paleognath
topology indicates that many characters are convergent in
the ratites,
probably as the result of adaptation to a cursorial life
style.