[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
RECEIVED - Dinosaur morphological diversity and the end-Cretaceous extinction - PDF REQUEST
Thanks all.
Jason
----- Original Message -----
> From: Jura <pristichampsus@yahoo.com>
> To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2012 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: Dinosaur morphological diversity and the end-Cretaceous
> extinction - PDF REQUEST
>
> If anyone has access to his paper, I'd love to get a copy.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Robert Schenck <schenck.rob@gmail.com>
>> To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, 1 May 2012 12:25 PM
>> Subject: Dinosaur morphological diversity and the end-Cretaceous extinction
> paper, 2012
>>
>> http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v3/n5/full/ncomms1815.html
>> Stephen L. Brusatte, Richard J. Butler, Albert Prieto-Márquez
> &
>> Mark A. Norell
>>
>> "The extinction of non-avian dinosaurs 65 million years ago is a
>> perpetual topic of fascination, and lasting debate has focused on
>> whether dinosaur biodiversity was in decline before end-Cretaceous
>> volcanism and bolide impact. Here we calculate the morphological
>> disparity (anatomical variability) exhibited by seven major dinosaur
>> subgroups during the latest Cretaceous, at both global and regional
>> scales. Our results demonstrate both geographic and clade-specific
>> heterogeneity. Large-bodied bulk-feeding herbivores (ceratopsids and
>> hadrosauroids) and some North American taxa declined in disparity
>> during the final two stages of the Cretaceous, whereas carnivorous
>> dinosaurs, mid-sized herbivores, and some Asian taxa did not. Late
>> Cretaceous dinosaur evolution, therefore, was complex: there was no
>> universal biodiversity trend and the intensively studied North
>> American record may reveal primarily local patterns. At least some
>> dinosaur groups, however, did endure long-term declines in
>> morphological variability before their extinction."
>>
>>
>> What's up with this article, it's listed as, not Nature, but Nature
>> Communications? Is there going to be an actual article publishe
at am I even
>> requesting, an actual full Nature article or some 'notice' of a
> study
>> in "Nature Communications"? Forgive my ignorance.
>>
>> --
>> Robert J. Schenck
>> Kingsborough Community College
>> Physical Sciences Department
>> Follow Me on Twitter: @Schenck
>>
>