[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:10:48 +0100
Authentication-results: msg-ip0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <SNT127-W259790BF77125C87B417E6E7690@phx.gbl>
References: <COL107-W305FF9807382685305C273AC650@phx.gbl>,<CA+nnY_G9vU9SEq02-fdPGtz+-CPWU3OnJwNYZsXKp5RvguRUTg@mail.gmail.com>,<20120226230134.166730@gmx.net>,<COL107-W56C38F4FA9D72B0D5A7A04AC690@phx.gbl> <SNT127-W259790BF77125C87B417E6E7690@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

> and this is true also of the Wikipedia
> page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambondro_mahabo . The context of this
> nomenclature isn't even mentioned in the page itself, which is -- I
> feel -- idiotic, not to mention disingenuous of further revisors of the
> page who HAVE read the paper.

It is immoral to complain about Wikipedia. Go and fix it yourself. Just click 
on "Edit". :-)

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: Jaime Headden <qi_leong@hotmail.com>

References:
- Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
- Re: Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
- Re: Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
- RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
  - From: Jaime Headden <qi_leong@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: PDF Request - Elephant tracks
Next by Date: RE: PDF Request - Elephant tracks
Previous by thread: RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
Next by thread: RE: Vitakridrinda publication validity
Indexes: