Re: 2012 US presidential race

[Paul P <turtlecroc@yahoo.com>]

You can't vote for someone based solely on one aspect 
of their position, e.g. science. This is how Republicans 
get elected in the first place, e.g. based on a single 
issue like abortion which appeals to people's irrational 
side. The fact that any Republican ever gets elected 
to any office is proof that people are too stupid to 
govern themselves. 

--- On Wed, 4/11/12, tyazbeck@comcast.net <tyazbeck@comcast.net> wrote:

> From: tyazbeck@comcast.net <tyazbeck@comcast.net>
> Subject: 2012 US presidential race
> To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
> Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2012, 7:20 PM
> 
> I know it's a little late, but...who
> do you all think is the best US presidential candidate, for
> scientists (including Obama!)? I personally think Newt
> gingrich is the best for science BY FAR, and i would say
> Santorum too, but he dropped out :( I am a conservative
> Roman Catholic just like him. But I'd be happy with anyone
> other than Obama, Ron Paul, Vermin Supreme (look him up!)or
> any obvious saboteurs( i.e. muslim brotherhood, nazi party
> etc.). I understand most scientists in the USA are
> Democrats...
>