[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Paleocene dinosaur dating controversy in Geology
- To: dinosaur@usc.edu
- Subject: Re: Paleocene dinosaur dating controversy in Geology
- From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:19:40 +0200
- Authentication-results: msg-ip1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- In-reply-to: <CAMR9O1LWoh=PCjc41OGBk08Ny_Dzrj_i=HPht=e2H-+0DxtgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAMR9O1LWoh=PCjc41OGBk08Ny_Dzrj_i=HPht=e2H-+0DxtgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
> The April issue of Geology has an open-access Forum reacting to a
> paper claiming to date a hadrosaur bone to the Paleocene:
>
> Fassett, J.E., Heaman, L.M., & Simonetti, A. (2011)
> Direct U-Pb dating of Cretaceous and Paleocene dinosaur bones, San
> Juan Basin, New Mexico.
> Geology 39: 159–162,
> doi:10.1130/G31466.1.
> free pdf:
> http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/39/2/159.full.pdf+html
>
> Comments and reaction to 2011 paper in the Forum section are open access:
> http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/current
The forum section is indeed open (and contains several interesting papers), but
the original paper is behind a paywall.