[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Molecular taxonomy for dummies?

To: ron.orenstein@rogers.com
Subject: Re: Molecular taxonomy for dummies?
From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:30:50 -0300
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: "dinosaur@usc.edu" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <AAE0437E-8047-4688-83A8-F4BF41404557@rogers.com>
References: <1316981963.68889.YahooMailClassic@web27508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <AAE0437E-8047-4688-83A8-F4BF41404557@rogers.com>
Reply-to: augustoharo@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

2011/9/26 Dr Ronald Orenstein <ron.orenstein@rogers.com>:
> who thinks that long branch attraction has something to do with romance.

Here I would want to click the Facebook "like" button.

I am in the same position as you in this. But long-branch attraction
seems to me to relate to a more general likelihoodist argument and
perhaps you would prefer a more general book on molecular
phylogenetics, as Hillis et al. (eds.), Molecular Systematics, which
is shown here: 
http://www.amazon.com/Molecular-Systematics-Second-David-Hillis/dp/0878932828.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Molecular taxonomy for dummies?
  - From: evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de>

References:
- Re: More evidence for Eufalconimorphae and Psittacopasserae
  - From: evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de>
- Molecular taxonomy for dummies?
  - From: Dr Ronald Orenstein <ron.orenstein@rogers.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Density of intraclade sampling (was: More evidence for Eufalconimorphae and Psittacopasserae)
Next by Date: Re: Molecular taxonomy for dummies?
Previous by thread: Re: Density of intraclade sampling (was: More evidence for Eufalconimorphae and Psittacopasserae)
Next by thread: Re: Molecular taxonomy for dummies?
Indexes: