[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review

To: <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>, <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
From: "Roadrunner" <villandra@austin.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:37:10 -0500
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <COL107-W23FC9781F6E1C187FCDF6FAC050@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: "Roadrunner" <villandra@austin.rr.com>
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Them female eorapters had better not bat no eyelashes.

LOLOLOLOL!

Uh, Mickey, I believe it's called a cartoon.

Dora

----- Original Message -----From: "Mickey Mortimer" <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 6:23 AM
Subject: Dinosaur Revolution Review

I decided to review the show on my blog. Read more athttp://theropoddatabase.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-review.htmlif you enjoy scathing criticism and snarky comments.
Mickey Mortimer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
  - From: "Roadrunner" <villandra@austin.rr.com>

References:
- Dinosaur Revolution Review
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Next by Date: Taxon sampling in cladistic analyses - some results from DNA
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Next by thread: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Indexes: