[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:20:45 +1100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.60.1110271445140.8989@frontier.uwyo.edu>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.60.1110271445140.8989@frontier.uwyo.edu>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Fri, Oct 28th, 2011 at 7:46 AM, "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu> 
wrote:

> http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=32315
>
> "We have a good story. We have a better story for four than we had for 
> three..."

Hardly an impressive statement. Chimpanzees typing randomly on typewriters 
could achieve that. :-
)

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
Spatial Data Analyst               Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
  - From: David Krentz <ddkrentz@charter.net>
- Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
- Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
  - From: James Stearns <jstea003@odu.edu>

References:
- Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: 11th specimen of Archaeopteryx
Next by Date: this is what I see on my browser for that article on Pelagornis chilensis
Previous by thread: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
Next by thread: Re: Another Jurassic Park movie rumor
Indexes: